W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: Comment on syntax

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:42:03 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0809211442y2c2d644cq311c199fcd7cd50a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "W3C OWL Working Group" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

In addition, it appears that one can not annotate an import directive
- this may be desirable, for example to comment on why a particular
version uri was chosen.
-Alan


On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Alan Ruttenberg
<alanruttenberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> "each annotation consists of an annotation property and an annotation value,
> and the latter can be a literal, an entity, or an anonymous individual."
>
> then
>
> An owl:incompatibleWith annotation value is the location of a prior version
> of the containing ontology that is incompatible with this ontology.
>
> Which sort of thing among literal, entity, or anonymous individual is "the
> location"
>
> More generally, why is not any URI reference allowed as the value of an
> annotation?
>
> The definition of entity should perhaps be earlier in the document, as it is
> used several times before it is defined.
>
> The current definition would seem to preclude have an ontologyuri or
> versionuri, for example, as values of an anntoation.
>
> -Alan
>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2008 21:42:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC