W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:41:00 +0200
Message-ID: <48CE65EC.1080104@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On 15 Sep 2008, at 11:42, Jim Hendler wrote:
> Let me try to tease out the various options. Corrections welcome.
> 1) (Alan's) We put a *triple* (i.e., change the graph) in. Advantages:
> "works"[1] for all RDF serializations. Disadvantages: Breaks syntactic
> layering; contaminates the graph and the structural model; *requires* a
> bespoke solution (thus precludes using standards like XInclude).

Just for my understanding: why would this solution preclude using
XInclude? If there is an extra triple defined in some vocabulary,
wouldn't that be orthogonal to the usage of XInclude?




Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 15 September 2008 13:41:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:07 UTC