W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: ISSUE-137 (including XML includes)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:57:47 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0809121257o260f19cardbc9f076b0379865@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org 

> There is *no* solution which is independent of the specific RDF serialization. If we
> define a bespoke solution, *all* serializations will have to be updated.

I don't understand this statement. An inclusion directive could be
expressed as an RDF triple, and the OWL documentation could specify
how it should be interpreted (i.e. by including the triples resulting
from parsing the included document).

-Alan
Received on Friday, 12 September 2008 19:58:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 19:58:22 GMT