The resolution of ISSUE-145 calls for MIME types for Functional Syntax, Manchester Syntax, and XML Serialization. To polish this off, we need the actual mime types. It is also a good idea to specify a preferred extension and some MAC stuff. I think that we need to make a "decision" on these. I suggest that if no consensus emerges before 5 November that we should discuss this on 5 November. The current suggestions (mine modified by Ivan): MIME Type Extension MAC file type Functional text/owl-functional .ofn TEXT Manchester text/owl-manchester .omn TEXT XML application/owl+xml ???? ??? Do we actually need to have a MAC file type? peterReceived on Friday, 24 October 2008 15:58:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 24 October 2008 15:58:41 GMT