Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158]

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:29:53 -0400 (EDT)
• To: sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
• Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <20081024.102953.854449762.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158]
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:18:03 +0100

> On 24 Oct 2008, at 13:28, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> >
> > One unsolved problem that *I* see here is that in Section 1.3 there is
> > the wording:
> >
> > ************************
> > SKOS data are then expressed as RDF triples. For example, the RDF  
> > graph
> > below expresses some facts about a thesaurus.
> >
> > <A> rdf:type skos:Concept ;
> >   skos:prefLabel "love"@en ;
> >   skos:altLabel "adoration"@en ;
> >   skos:broader <B> ;
> >   skos:inScheme <S> .
> > ***********************
> >
> > This uses Turtle syntax, but is before
> >
> > ******************
> >
> > Examples of RDF graphs are given using the Terse RDF Triple language
> > (Turtle) [TURTLE].
> >
> > *********************
> 
> Peter
> 
> Would a forward reference to 1.7.3 address your concerns?
> 
> 	Sean

Yes - although I *hate* forward references!

peter

Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 14:31:12 UTC