Re: proposal for dateTime (ISSUE-138)

> There has been some discussion of whether OWL can use XSD's new datatype
> dateTime with required timezone, because our notion of equality derives
> from the timeline for time, not the XSD 7-value internal data structure
> for xsd:dateTime.  However, our notion of equality *is* the notion of
> equality used in XSD for dateTime values with a required timezone, and
> thus retains compatibility with XSD.
> 
> I propose that we resolve ISSUE-138 by staying with owl:dateTime in the
> next round of publication but to put in a note saying that this datatype
> is to be considered xsd:dateTime with a required timezone and that we
> will move to the new XSD name for this datatype as soon as it is
> determined.

Isn't the next publication expected to be Last Call?

Do you have any indication how long it will talk to have this
determination?

      -- Sandro