- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:53:27 -0400
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
1. I think I've fixed the HTML entity problems that plagued several
documents. There is now a "diff-from-wiki.html" generated for each
document, which should make it fairly easy to check for document
mutilation:
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-syntax-20081008/diff-from-wiki
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-semantics-20081008/diff-from-wiki
... etc
So, actually, html->dom->html can't be done perfectly since it's not
1-1. This shows up in the diff for Syntax by highlighting a place
where "|" was put in the wiki as a numeric entity, and the −
entity was not used when it could/should have been. Neither of
these are a problem, and if they are changed in the wiki there
should be no green/red in the diff except at the top & bottom. (If
it starts to be clean like this, I can automate the check of
course.)
2. I'm not sure the References problem Alan was seeing. My code was
actually using "editors" whenever "author's" wasn't defined, so it
cut over properly as far as I can/could tell.
3. Test/Conformance had some broken anchors/links which I fixed
4. Profiles has many broken fragments:
Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
ref-conformance: 854, 904, 1664
ref-owl-2-rdf-mapping: 1689
ref-owl-2-rdf-semantics: 1660, 1697
ref-owl-2-specification: 340, 437, 479, 497, 517, 520, 527, 537, 547, 554, 573, 688, 692, 731, 764, 821, 830, 912, 917, 960, 1012, 1028, 1049, 1074
Relationship_between_OWL_2_RL_and_OWL_2_Full: 853
OWL_2_RL_Ontologies: 844, 850
ref-owl-2-direct-semantics: 1711
5. (I think the duplicate "Abstract" is actually correct.)
6. I still need to put the SOTD text into place, and write the FPWD
text.
I think that's it. Maybe we can publish later today?
-- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 16:53:41 UTC