RE: change to functional syntax document

Well, this actually solves the problem reported by Mike Smith:
 
  <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Oct/0039.html>

  "In addition, the document specifies a mapping 
  from Manchester syntax to the functional syntax.
  The mapping in the other direction, while intuitive, 
  is not specified.  I don't believe it a requirement, 
  but think the forward mapping would be nice to have."

SCNR,
Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
>Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:55 PM
>To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
>Subject: Re: change to functional syntax document
>
>
>:)
>Whoops - editing too late at night.
>Fixed.
>-Alan
>
>On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
><pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>>
>> I just noticed that http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax is now the
>> Manchester syntax document.  I'm not against this change, per se, but
>it
>> probably should have been discussed in the working group.
>>
>> peter
>>
>>