W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2008

ACTION 237: review for

From: Markus Krötzsch <mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 19:02:37 +0100
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200811041902.48431.mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Below is my review for

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Data_Range_Extension:_Linear_Equations

This addresses Action 237.

Markus


In addition to what Boris and Bernardo already said, I have the following 
comments:

* "one might be wish" -> "one might wish"
* "can be used to defined classes" -> "can be used to define classes"
* Section 2?
* Sec 3.1, first set of production rules:
 ** Non-terminal "rational" should be capitalised.
 ** I don't get the purpose of 
     'times' '(' [ rational ] Variable | Variable ')'
    Why not just say:
     'times' '(' [ Rational ] Variable ')'
 ** Similarly with the following:
     'plus' '(' Term { Term } | Term ')' 
    which could be 
     'plus' '(' Term { Term } ')' 
* I don't understand what Sec. 3.3 tries to convey. Maybe make an editors note 
"under construction"?
* What happened to the various types of comparisons in Sec 3.4?
* I agree with Boris regarding the issues with the semantics definition for 
variable comparisons. A unified treatment of the various comparisons would 
probably fix this en route.

Overall, the document would benefit from more verbose explanations to better 
explain the purposes and intuitions of the technical definitions.


-- 
Markus Krötzsch
Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe
phone +49 (0)721 608 7362          fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de          www  http://korrekt.org


Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2008 18:03:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 4 November 2008 18:03:30 GMT