W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: comments in functional-style syntax

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:04:50 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0810312104g16bffdd2k6076e76999dfb0c3@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

Hello Peter,
If one SHOULD use the utf-8 encoding, do we not need some way of
specifying if an alternate choice is made? Perhaps it would make sense
to simply specify this as a MUST.
-Alan


On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>
> Also for syntax:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=14280&oldid=14275
>
> peter
>
>
> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> Subject: comments in Manchester syntax
> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:16:55 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> I added Turtle-style comments to the Manchester syntax document.
>>
>> The diffs are at:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=ManchesterSyntax&diff=14178&oldid=13954
>>
>>
>> peter
>
>
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 04:05:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 1 November 2008 04:05:27 GMT