Re: Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Subject: Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:11:13 +0200

> Peter, Bijan,
> 
> I was wondering whether this is an oversight or there is something
> 'deeper' that I do not get. In the RDF/XML definition of a Teenager it
> says:
> 
> <owl11:minInclusive rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">13<...
> ...
> <owl11:onDataRange rdf:resource="&xsd;integer"/>
> 
> (I found several places with similar patterns). Semantically it is all
> right, but for a primer reader wouldn't it be better to use the same
> xsd: datatypes for all?
> 
> Ivan

Definitly deeper.  :-)

This peculiarity has to do with the Manchester syntax output of Protege
4, I think.

I've moved everything to xsd:integer.

peter