W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20080331.193518.160147668.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: ivan@w3.org
Cc: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Subject: Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:11:13 +0200

> Peter, Bijan,
> 
> I was wondering whether this is an oversight or there is something
> 'deeper' that I do not get. In the RDF/XML definition of a Teenager it
> says:
> 
> <owl11:minInclusive rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">13<...
> ...
> <owl11:onDataRange rdf:resource="&xsd;integer"/>
> 
> (I found several places with similar patterns). Semantically it is all
> right, but for a primer reader wouldn't it be better to use the same
> xsd: datatypes for all?
> 
> Ivan

Definitly deeper.  :-)

This peculiarity has to do with the Manchester syntax output of Protege
4, I think.

I've moved everything to xsd:integer.

peter
Received on Monday, 31 March 2008 23:42:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 March 2008 23:42:42 GMT