- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:35:18 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ivan@w3.org
- Cc: bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> Subject: Another mini comment on the RDF/XML examples in the Primer Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:11:13 +0200 > Peter, Bijan, > > I was wondering whether this is an oversight or there is something > 'deeper' that I do not get. In the RDF/XML definition of a Teenager it > says: > > <owl11:minInclusive rdf:datatype="&xsd;int">13<... > ... > <owl11:onDataRange rdf:resource="&xsd;integer"/> > > (I found several places with similar patterns). Semantically it is all > right, but for a primer reader wouldn't it be better to use the same > xsd: datatypes for all? > > Ivan Definitly deeper. :-) This peculiarity has to do with the Manchester syntax output of Protege 4, I think. I've moved everything to xsd:integer. peter
Received on Monday, 31 March 2008 23:42:42 UTC