comment on fragments

I have one 'must fix' editorial comment on the fragments proposal before 
FPWD.

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Fragments_Proposal


I hope to add other comments of a less critical nature to the Wiki, time 
permitting.


The must fix comment is that the OWL-R section, particularly the OWL-R 
Full section, must reference ter Horst's pD* paper. In my view it is 
inappropriate even to publish a FPWD without at least a place holder to 
appropriate acknowledgement of sources.

The minimum change to address this comment would be to add an editor's 
note with a TO-DO, but it is probably as easy just to do it.

The same is probably true for the other two fragments, but I am less 
informed as to what are the appropriate references.

I believe I will have something an HP review of the OWL-R section 
shortly before the F2F - and we have done enough work to be fairly 
confiodent that this will be almost wholly positive.

Jeremy