Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86

On Mar 26, 2008, at 9:45 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 21:30 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>> RDF/XML serialization for anonymous inverse properties
>
>> I think it is beneficial to allow for anonymous inverses in
>> ObjectPropertyAssertion.
>
> Can you elaborate this?  If we don't have a real requirement for this,
> the simplest resolution* to ISSUE-86 is to require named object
> properties in object property assertions.

There are certainly a variety of cases I have personally run in to  
where there is a need for a property inverse for formulating an  
axiom, but the property  is not needed for query or for stating facts.

If it seemed like this was going to be a real problem I'd say drop  
it, but it doesn't seem that difficult to accomplish.

-Alan