W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday

From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:03:51 -0400
Message-ID: <47D80CF7.2060006@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
CC: "Web Ontology Language ((((OWL)))) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

RPI will volunteer to review the Primer.
We also recognize Bijan's email about the syntax issues and his very 
good suggestion of having an automated hookup to the owl api (or similar 
translator) so for the moment will not address the syntax issue.

Deborah

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
> We will discuss steps towards our next working drafts. As we discussed 
> at the teleconference last week, if you have time, please read the 
> current documents that we are considering for working draft, and bring 
> issues to the teleconference. As in the previous release, we need to 
> know how we will handle disputes - are we comfortable marking them 
> with editor notes, as previous, or are there any issues that must be 
> resolved before publishing.
>
>  - http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Primer
>  - http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Fragments_Proposal
>  - http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/XML_Serialization
>
> We would like to have two independent reviewers for each document. 
> Please consider volunteering to be a reviewer for one or more document.
>
> An issue I know to be outstanding re: the Primer is the use of 
> Manchester syntax. Please give some thought to whether you think this 
> is a good or bad idea, and why and be prepared to defend your position.
>
> Agenda to follow tomorrow.
>
> -Alan
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:04:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 12 March 2008 17:04:11 GMT