W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: General discussion for TC Wednesday

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:18:34 +0100
Message-ID: <47D694BA.4050105@w3.org>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 3/ The examples in the primer are rendered in four different syntaxes,
>    Manchester, Functional-Style, OWL XML, and RDF/XML.  Each can be
>    turned on and off separately.  Protege 4 was used to generate the
>    different syntaxes, starting from the same ontology in Protege 4.
>    The complete ontologies are on the WG Wiki at 
> 	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleManchester
> 	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleFunctional
> 	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleOWLXML
> 	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleRDFXML
>    However, the versions in the document have be extensively edited, and
>    also modified to fix several bugs in Protege 4.  The probably would
>    not read back into Protege 4 or any other OWL 1.1 tool.  (If you do
>    try this and can fix the files, please do so, but only if you also
>    change the Primer document itself.)  Before final publication the
>    examples will have to be fixed to be completely correct.

I would very much favour of having a turtle version, too. It is widely 
used in the community and, mainly for a primer, the readability of the 
example in Turtle is a major plus.



Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:18:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:03 UTC