Jeff Z. Pan wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, >> [...] >> Since DL-Lite is defined from OWL 1.1 DL, then we run the risk that >> answers from >> >> SPARQL over triple-store over database. >> >> become false over >> >> SPARQL over DL-Lite over triple-store over database. >> >> (I am happy to be corrected if this is not the case; I am not expert >> in any of the technologies mentioned in this message!) > > Could you clarify what do we mean by "over" here? > I am trying to understand http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdf-sparql-query-20080115/#sparqlBGPExtend which I believe will contain the answer to your question. I might manage to be less cryptic tomorrow. JeremyReceived on Monday, 3 March 2008 17:06:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 March 2008 17:06:35 GMT