Re: RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification

The point I was making is that it that I though that it was  
unreasonable for owl not to have the reified triple, and therefore  
this is well suited ;-)

I also pointed out that it nullified the argument that there was an  
additional parsing burden to parse the "extra"  actual reified  
triple. In effect the RDF/XML shorthand makes the parsing burden for  
a fully reified triple only slightly more than for the triple itself.

-Alan

On Jun 25, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

>
> It appears to me that the RDF/XML shorthand for RDF reification  
> creates
> named reification, i.e., it names the reified triple.  I believe that
> this means that its use is not reasonable for OWL.
>
> peter
>