W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship]

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:41:25 -0400
Message-Id: <AD23CDAB-B240-498B-AF16-BB36A460EBAE@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Michael Schneider'" <schneid@fzi.de>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>

I don't think the bouncing from editorial to non-editorial strategy  
worked, so let's resolve this in the standard way on the agenda.
-Alan

On Jun 10, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Boris Motik wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I don't see any problem in doing this. Therefore, if there are no  
> objections, we can declare this to be editorial and I'll just
> change the mapping.
>
> Regards,
>
> 	Boris
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- 
>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael
>> Schneider
>> Sent: 10 June 2008 13:47
>> To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: ISSUE-124: Proposal to rename URI in RDF mapping of  
>> datarange complements [WAS: RDF mapping
>> of datarange complements brings problem for DL/Full relationship]
>>
>> [related to ISSUE-124]
>>
>> Peter F. Patel-Schneider answered to me on Thursday, June 05:
>>
>>> OK, if you keep the same meaning for owl:complementOf for  
>>> datatypes and
>>> you keep the same RDF mapping for datatype complements, then you  
>>> do get
>>> this result.
>>>
>>> The solution is then to change one of the premises, and I'm  
>>> perfectly
>>> happy modifying the RDF mapping.
>>>
>>> peter
>>
>> So, as discussed at the last telco, I propose to change the RDF  
>> mapping for
>> datarange complements from currently
>>
>>   _:x rdf:type rdfs:Datatype
>>   _:x owl:complementOf T(DR)
>>
>> to
>>
>>   _:x rdf:type rdfs:Datatype
>>   _:x owl:datatypeComplementOf T(DR)
>>
>> This naming seems coherent, since we then always talk about  
>> "datatype"s in
>> the context of datarange (or datatype) restrictions:
>>
>>   * ... rdf:type rdfs:Datatype
>>   * ... owl:onDatatype ...
>>   * ... owl:datatypeComplementOf ...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 13:42:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 June 2008 13:42:12 GMT