The reverse mapping only removes rdf:Property triples in the presence of another property typing triple - a declaration, in the same graph. This leads to a situation in which an OWL 1 ontology which has x rdf:type rdf:property, and x rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty in the imports closure, valid in OWL 1, would be considered syntactically invalid in OWL 2. The repair, I believe, is to remove those rows that mention rdf:Property the reverse mapping in table 4 and simply say that all triples x rdf:type rdf:Propery are deleted. -AlanReceived on Saturday, 7 June 2008 13:28:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 7 June 2008 13:28:48 GMT