W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:12:22 -0400
Message-ID: <29af5e2d0806040312l63c5ca5fuc07a01d98cdf6a22@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg@w3.org

On 6/3/08, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

>  This means RIF needs to pick URIs for these in the next week or two.
>  The namespace in that draft is
>  "http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-import-profile", but if OWL is going to use
>  the same identifiers, we probably want something different.  Also, when
>  it says "OWL-DL" it means OWL1 DL.  Is that just a syntactic fragment of
>  OWL2 DL, or are there different semantics?

We're not sure yet. Depends on, at a minimum, how we resolve the
question of bnode semantics.

Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2008 10:13:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC