Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111)

On 6/3/08, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
>

>  This means RIF needs to pick URIs for these in the next week or two.
>  The namespace in that draft is
>  "http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-import-profile", but if OWL is going to use
>  the same identifiers, we probably want something different.  Also, when
>  it says "OWL-DL" it means OWL1 DL.  Is that just a syntactic fragment of
>  OWL2 DL, or are there different semantics?

We're not sure yet. Depends on, at a minimum, how we resolve the
question of bnode semantics.

-Alan