W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: ISSUE-90 and ISSUE-91 backwards compatibility of versioning information: possible fixes

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:29:55 +0000
Message-Id: <96584A38-AE5A-47CD-8D0B-DDFC07720825@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>

Some of the potential difficulties in the proposed fixes seem to  
arise from various round-tripping concerns, e.g., what would happen  
if an ontology were "round-tripped" from 1.1 to 1.0 and back again.

Do we need to concern ourselves with this? It seems to be setting the  
bar very high -- I doubt that many updates of languages or software  
would allow for such a thing.

Ian



On 23 Jan 2008, at 11:28, Rinke Hoekstra wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> I've added a section on possible alternative fixes for ISSUE-90 and  
> ISSUE-91 to the ontology versions page on the wiki [1].
>
> -Rinke
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Ontology_Versions#Possible_Fixes
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Drs. Rinke Hoekstra
>
> Email: hoekstra@uva.nl    Skype:  rinkehoekstra
> Phone: +31-20-5253499     Fax:   +31-20-5253495
> Web:   http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke
>
> Leibniz Center for Law,          Faculty of Law
> University of Amsterdam,            PO Box 1030
> 1000 BA  Amsterdam,             The Netherlands
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 10:30:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 January 2008 10:30:16 GMT