- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:02:30 +0000
- To: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 23, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Boris Motik wrote: > > Hello, > > (In my e-mails I used OWL/RDF for "OWL ontologies encoded in RDF/ > XML".) > > I'm not sure I understand how RDF/XML is different from RDF graphs: > I always thought that RDF/XML can be used to serialize each RDF > graph; thus, I saw them as being of the same expressive power. > > Regards, > > Boris > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel- >> Schneider >> Sent: 23 January 2008 18:02 >> To: boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk >> Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with >> roundtripping when going from >> functional-style syntax into RDF and back >> >> >> From: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk> >> Subject: RE: ISSUE-94 (n-ary constucts and RDF): Problem with >> roundtripping when going from >> functional-style syntax into RDF and back >> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:17:51 -0000 >> >>> >>> Hello Peter, >>> >>> I am not sure I understand what you mean with (1) and (2): how does >>> round-tripping through OWL/RDF differ from roundtripping through >> ^^^^^^^ RDF/XML? >>> RDF graphs? >> >> OWL/RDF and RDF graphs have differing expressive power, so round >> tripping through them can be different. >> >> >>> To make things clear, the type of roundtripping that this issue >>> talks >>> about is the following: >>> >>> OWL Functional Syntax -> RDF graph (or OWL/RDF) -> OWL Functional >>> Syntax >> >> Again, what is OWL/RDF? If it is RDF/XML then it is different >> from RDF >> graphs. >> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Boris >> >> peter > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 19:03:04 UTC