W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability)

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:01:23 +0000
Message-ID: <479756C3.8060100@hpl.hp.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org


Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> OWL 1.0 DL is a sublanguage of OWL 1.0 Full so what changes here?
> 


We could present OWL 1.1 very differently:

define OWL 1.1 Full, and then a large number of fragments including OWL DL.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:02:16 GMT

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 January 2008 15:02:17 GMT