Re: Punning discussion

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

> 2) Two cited cases for punning are Metamodeling and being able to have 
> real properties on classes/properties. But what exactly do people 
> consider Metamodeling, and does the punning proposal address these 
> cases. As an example, it does not address the cases on Conrad's 
> Metamodeling page because we don't plan to support modification of owl 
> syntax.
> 

I think it would be much easier to have this discussion in the context 
of a consensus use case and requirements document. I suggested we 
postpone further discussion of punning until after we have published 
such a document.

Jeremy