W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Reminder: UFDTF TC Monday January 21, 2008

From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:36:56 -0500
Message-ID: <47949FF8.8010008@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

it looks in the listing below that you missed my response as well on sat 
- see

in particular i raise again that there is the issue of continuity of 
You mentioned at the last meeting that you had some ideas about that but 
we did not have time to discuss them before the meeting ended.  i would 
like to hear them and i thought this point was going to be on the agenda 
at the next meeting.

one reason i think it is timely is because below you ask if this current 
primer effort is headed in a direction with further work to meet the 
overview and guide deliverable.  i brought up at the f2f when this was 
mentioned that i do not believe that is the right move and while the 
current work is further along and shows promise as a useful document, 
nothing about it has changed my position that it does not meet the 
deliverable for at least the overview.

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/UFDTF/Agenda.2008.01.21
> UFDTF Agenda
> January 21, 2008, 10 AM EST
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 69594 (OWLWG)
> Dial-In #: + (Nice, France)
> Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
> Admin (5 minutes)
> * Roll call
> * Agenda Amendments
> Action review (5 minutes)
> The following actions are open
> * Action 32 UFDTF Write up some mfg user classes / Evan Wallace
> * Action 65 UFDTF Will think about organization during the week/ Elisa 
> Kendall
> Agenda
> Discuss Peter and Bijan's effots. (45 minutes) (see 
> Experiments_with_documents). Question: Do people feel that they meet 
> intended purposes? If not, what's the delta. Are we heading towards 
> consensus that a document in the style of the Primer will be one of 
> our UFDs? If so, which deliverable do we agree it can meet (with 
> further work).
> * Primer intended to meet the Overview and User Guide deliverables
> ** Conrad's comments re: Primer
> * Structural_Reference_Experiment (also version with toggles on views 
> of various types of elements) Intended as start to combine Reference 
> with specification documents. See also Semantics_Experiment.
> * OWL Numerics (time and interest permitting - Alan's gut is that this 
> should wait for future meeting)
> *Trimming Who Reads Our Documents (10 minutes) For which users will we 
> not attempt to write documentation for.
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 13:37:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC