W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: Universal Property

From: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:45:17 +0100 (CET)
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801181542090.10840@frege.inf.tu-dresden.de>

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
> So, would a concrete proposal that we'd introduce a "owl:RoleThing" that is 
> the superrole of all other roles?

What does "the superrole" mean? The smallest superrole? That would
give you transitive closure in the case you have only a single other
role.  Or an arbitrary superrole? That's also not the semantics of the
universal role and it would break a lot of uses of the universal
role. The semantics should be: the crossproduct of the whole domain.

> If so, for symmetry we should introduce the 
> owl:RoleNothing (ok, better names, please!) (which would be easily definable 
> by disjointness with owl:RoleThing).

Fine with me.

greetings,
 		Carsten

--
*      Carsten Lutz, Institut f"ur Theoretische Informatik, TU Dresden       *
*     Office phone:++49 351 46339171   mailto:lutz@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de     *
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 14:46:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 January 2008 14:46:02 GMT