W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: ISSUE-16 (entity annotations)

From: Deborah L. McGuinness <dlm@ksl.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:26:10 -0500
Message-ID: <478BA942.2030908@ksl.stanford.edu>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org

i would use option 2a if available and i would not be able to encode 
some of the things i need to encode for my knowledge provenance work if 
i can not annotate annotations.
Thus, also, if there is a vote, i vote for 2a.


Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> In ISUE-16, Jeremy points out an asymmetry in the treatement of
> annotations in OWL 1.1.
> There are two kinds of top-level "annotations" in OWL 1.1, 
> 1/ Entity Annotations, which are axioms
> 2/ Annotations on Ontologies, which are not axioms
> I agree that this asymmetry is not ideal.
> There appear to be two ways to recover symmetry here:
> 1/ Make Entity Annotations not be axioms, which, to retain symmetry,
>    would probably end up not allowing annotations on entity annotations
>    (but leaving annotations on entities), so one could say:
>    EntityAnnotation(OWLClass(Person)
>      Label("People") Comment("The Class of People"))
>    but *not*
>    EntityAnnotation(Annotation(creatorsName "Peter F. Patel-Schneider")
>      OWLClass(Person) Label("People") Comment("The Class of People"))
> 2/ Make Annotations on Ontologies be axioms, which would probably allow
>    annotations on entity annotation axioms, and also allow annotations
>    on ontology annotations, as in
>    Ontology(<http://foo.ex/foo>
>      Comment(Annotation(creatorsName "Peter F. Patel-Schneider")
>              "An ontology about nothing at all"))
> 2a/ The second option could be extended to allow annotations on any
>     annotation, as in 
>    EntityAnnotation(Annotation(creatorsName "Peter F. Patel-Schneider")
>      OWLClass(Person)
>      Label(Annotation(creatorsName "Peter F. Patel-Schneider") "People")
>      Comment(Annotation(creatorsName "Bijan Parsia") "The Class of People"))
> I think that I would vote for option 2a, even though it is the largest
> changed to the current situation.
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Bell Labs Research
> PS:  I make not claims about the suitability of the actual annotations
>      in the examples above.
> PPS: I expect that there is a missing "not" after "should" in the
>      description of the issue in the issue list.
Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 18:26:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC