W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: OWL-1.1-Full TF [Was: Introductions]

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:52:19 +0000
Message-ID: <478B9343.3000702@hpl.hp.com>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
CC: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org

Jim Hendler wrote:

> Michael - I have no clue what the above means - the members of the WG 
> are bothering those who care about Full with details of DL -- the 
> charter makes it clear that, unfortunately IMO, this WG is responsible 
> for DL and Full, so all issues w/respect to Full are completely within 
> the WG charter and it is NOT "polluting" to have issues and actions with 
> respct to Full - in fact, if we don't, a question could be raised by the 
> AC as to whether we actually addressed our charter commitments.

I understood Michael's point being that for any task-force type 
sub-activity the minutae of "this needs to be done, and that needs to be 
done, and what choice are we making here" is best done in a way that the 
rest of the WG can easily ignore. I think this is pertinent.

Not that the bigger issues and responsibilities can be ignored.

Received on Monday, 14 January 2008 16:52:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC