W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: skolems: visible differences?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 14:03:02 +0000
Message-Id: <6408706F-6768-4CA0-B950-F1ED80E053E8@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

On Jan 13, 2008, at 1:23 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Hmm, but this is not complete with respect to entailment in the RDF
> semantics, as far as I can tell.

It is, in fact, not complete.

I regard that fact as a feature, not a bug. It is more important to  
be backward compatible with universal practice, expectation, etc.  
than with a (IMHO) buggy (rather, mal-designed) prior spec.

One could always have complete existential semantics (such that a  
bnode is equivalent to a someValuesFrom) in the OWL Full semantics.  
OWL 1.1 DL will just be incomplete wrt to that semantics, but that's  
nothing new. Given the choice between admitting more OWL Full graphs  
as OWL DL, and making sure that the graphs that we do admit are  
semantically identical under OWL DL and OWL Full, I pick the former.

Received on Sunday, 13 January 2008 14:03:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC