Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL

Hi Jeremy,
> [...]
> Since DL-Lite is defined from OWL 1.1 DL, then we run the risk that 
> answers from
>
> SPARQL over triple-store over database.
>
> become false over
>
> SPARQL over DL-Lite over triple-store over database.
>
> (I am happy to be corrected if this is not the case; I am not expert 
> in any of the technologies mentioned in this message!)

Could you clarify what do we mean by "over" here?

Jeff



>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>