W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 09:51:48 +0100
Message-ID: <47B94724.9090004@w3.org>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
CC: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I certainly meant informational in my original mail (just as the RDFS 
rules are not normative either). In some cases, like for OWLPrime, these 
could also become normative (in some way or other...)

Ivan

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> What I think I'm hearing is a proposal for an *informative* section in 
> the documents giving a (possibly incomplete) definition of OWL, in the 
> interest of making it more understandable.
> 
> -Alan
> 
> On Feb 14, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
>>
>> Ivan Herman wrote:
>>> I *always* use those entailement rules to explain,
>>
>> I think OWL gets too complicated to express only by means of rules.
>>
>> I am trying to make a formal point, that I am sure somewhat else could 
>> make better.
>>
>> Essential rules work for RDF, RDFS, and even pD* because if you apply 
>> all the rules until they can't apply anymore (and take appropriate 
>> steps with certain problems) you can end up with a workable piece of 
>> code (for example Jena rules).
>>
>> But this approach fails if taken to the limit.
>>
>> I guess it would be possible to have a set of rules that was not 
>> practical in that way (that the closure is badly infinite, i.e. 
>> infinite in ways which you can't work around), which did articulate 
>> the semantics of OWL ....
>>
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Monday, 18 February 2008 08:53:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 February 2008 08:53:03 GMT