On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Boris Motik wrote: > Finally, we would extend the semantics document to treat anonymous > individuals in exactly the same way as this is done in SPARQL. This > would give us a slightly weaker semantics than what is currently > available in OWL (1.0) Full. Hi Boris, This seems to be the skolem proposal again, as close as I can tell. Do I misunderstand? -AlanReceived on Monday, 18 February 2008 05:48:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 18 February 2008 05:48:25 GMT