W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008

From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:20:54 -0800
Message-ID: <47B2FCC6.4030309@sandsoft.com>
To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Regrets for this afternoon - I'm traveling.

Happy Valentine's Day (almost),

Elisa

Ian Horrocks wrote:

>
> Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda
>
> Call in details
>
> If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,  
> Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
>
>     * Date of Call: Wednesday February 13, 2007
>     * Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),  
> 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
>     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
>     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
>     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
>     * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
>     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl  
> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
>     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc  
> (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
>     * Duration: 90 minutes
>     * Chair: Ian Horrocks
>     * Scribe: Scribe List
>     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 
> 2008.02.13/Agenda
>
> Agenda
>
>     * ADMIN (15 min)
>           o Roll call
>           o Agenda amendments
>           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes
>           o Washington F2F (10 min)
>                 + OWLED
>                 + Observers
>                 + Registration and/or Sponsorship
>                 + Attendees
>           o Action items status
>                 + Pending Review Actions
>                       # Action 78 Explain what delta to 1.0  semantics 
> means / Michael Schneider
>                       # Action 80 Will describe an approach to a  
> "operationall semantics" approach to OWL Full / James Hendler
>                       # Action 81 Send out proposal for minimal  
> change for issue-3 / Peter Patel-Schneider
>                       # Action 82 Edit the secification to mention  
> the well-known ontology properties in the spirit of OWL 1.0 and thus  
> possibly resolve ISSUE-91 / Boris Motik
>                       # Action 84 Change the spec to add a table  with 
> facet-datatype compatibility / Boris Motik
>                 + Due and overdue Actions
>                       # Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test  
> cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke
>                       # Action 62 Add test guidelines to working  
> group to agenda for next week / Alan Ruttenberg
>                       # Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto  a 
> wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the  
> question about object data property punning vs annotation  properties) 
> / Alan Ruttenberg
>
>     * Proposals to Resolve Issues (15 mins)
>           o Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http:// 
> lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0029.html)
>           o Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see http:// 
> lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html)
>           o Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the  
> datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction  
> construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/ 
> 2008Feb/0063.html)
>     * General Discussions (30 min)
>           o Fragments and Conformance (Continued)
>     * Issues (15 min)
>           o Raised Issues
>           o Resolved Editorial Issues
>           o Issue Discussions
>                 + Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more  
> precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality  
> constructors)
>                 + Issue 16 Entity annotations status
>                 + Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full
>                 + Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for  
> classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility)
>                 + Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping
>     * Additional other business (5 min)
>
> Next Week(s)
>
>     * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
>           o Fragments and Conformance
>           o Imports
>           o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full  compatibility)
>           o Versioning
>           o Easy Keys
>           o Rich Annotations
>           o Test Cases
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:21:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:21:13 GMT