W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

issue 68 - nonmonotonicity in mapping

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:08:19 +0000
Message-ID: <47B1E093.1050303@hpl.hp.com>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
CC: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Ian Horrocks wrote:

>                 + Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more 
> precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality 
> constructors)

The QCR issues are not the ones I wished to highlight in raising issue 
68, which is about e.g.

"DOMAIN[op] expands to rdfs:domain if OnlyOP(op) = true, and to 
owl11:objectPropertyDomain otherwise;"

There is discussion of various possibilities for QCRs under


which does agree with Peter's assessment that there are issues with the 
current mapping rules for QCRs.


I suspect that the agenda item is to discuss that rather than say the 
DOMAIN[op] macro.

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 18:09:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:02 UTC