W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > February 2008

Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:55:11 +0000
Message-Id: <CEDD1B2A-32EF-4E03-8030-E83FD33AC83C@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, Peter Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>

Thanks Jeremy for catching this.

Jim, can I please draw your attention to [1] and ask you to exercise  
a little more restraint.

Thanks,
Ian

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0395.html

On 7 Feb 2008, at 17:23, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

>
> Jim Hendler wrote:
>> Mike - that's easy - there's the semantics document the Webbies  
>> preferred and the one the formal KR folks preferred - can you  
>> guess which is which?
>
>
> please - we have enough conflict with today's battles, without  
> digging up the graves from battles that were won or lost long ago.
>
> Jeremy
>
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 21:55:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 February 2008 21:55:40 GMT