W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-157]

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 08:26:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20081211.082609.204104075.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org, public-owl-wg@w3.org

Hmm, I responded personally because I seem to remember that I made both
personal and WG comments.  I don't expect any different response from
the WG, but I'll try to get the WG's attention quickly on this.

Ian/Alan:  Can we put this on the agenda for next week's call?

peter


From: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-157]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:07:15 +0000

> 
> On 10 Dec 2008, at 21:51, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> >
> > These all appear to be reasonable responses, personally.
> 
> Peter
> 
> I note your wording here. Should we also expect an official response
> from the WG, or can we consider this issue dealt with?
> 
> 	Sean
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 13:26:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 December 2008 13:26:31 GMT