W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: Features RIA bad display

From: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 15:56:24 +0100
Message-ID: <b0ed1d660812030656i516bcb2byeb4cd79c3c5b580b@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: "Ian Horrocks" <ianh@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Yes it's now OK for me at [4] but it is *not*  at [1] i.e. in the Call for
Exclusion that was sent this morning,  *even* with Firefox see snaps
attached.

[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-new-features-20081202/

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/

Dear Advisory Committee representative,
This is a W3C Patent Policy Call for Exclusions for the following
Recommendation Track documents:
- OWL 2 Web Ontology Language:Manchester Syntax
 (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/),
 exclusion opportunity ending on  1 May 2009 23:59 UTC
- OWL 2 Web Ontology Language:New Features and Rationale
 (http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/),
 exclusion opportunity ending on  1 May 2009 23:59 UTC
 <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/>

Christine
2008/12/3 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>

>
> It looks okay as published for me.  Does it look okay for you, too?
>
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-owl2-new-features-20081202/
>
> Right?
>
>      -- Sandro
>
> > ------=_Part_117784_5103846.1228300144779
> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> >       boundary="----=_Part_117785_23337129.1228300144780"
> >
> > ------=_Part_117785_23337129.1228300144780
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > Hi Sandro
> >
> > After conversion from the Wiki, composition operator used in  RIA does
> not
> > display correctly at *several* place in the present W3C Working Draft 02
> > December 2008 [1], while they displayed correctly before in the W3C
> Editor's
> > Draft 28 November 2008 [2] and are correct on the Wiki [3] cf. snaps
> > attached.
> >
> > Is it still possible to be fixed or is it too late?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-new-features/
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-new-features-20081128/<
> http://ww
> > w.w3.org/2007/OWL/draft/ED-owl2-new-features-20081128>
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/New_Features_and_Rationale
> >
> > --
> > Christine
> >
> > ------=_Part_117785_23337129.1228300144780
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
>
> --
> Christine
>



NotOKWithFirefox.JPG
(image/jpeg attachment: NotOKWithFirefox.JPG)

OK.JPG
(image/jpeg attachment: OK.JPG)

Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2008 14:57:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 December 2008 14:57:02 GMT