W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: XML Syntax: Attributes

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 14:48:43 +0100
Message-Id: <EBD99C00-75A3-4F1A-B039-36EF9A79C9E8@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

On 28 Aug 2008, at 14:28, Sandro Hawke wrote:

>> This sounds like a good idea to me.
> Me too.
> BTW I raised issue-109 on a w3c staff list yesterday and it's turned
> into a huge discussion.  Not a simple topic.  :-(    Hopefully  
> we'll end
> up with some useful information to share.

Hmm. So I've initiated a DoS attack on the W3C team? Cool. Just call  
me "The DoStroyer"! Or maybe I'm just "DoStraught"?

Someone stop me before I pun (though not properties) again!

If it helps, there's no ambiguity. There is no element named with a  
URI and there is no property or class named with a QName.

With no-attribute-namespaces, it won't be usual to have no prefixes  
for syntax names, further reducing any potential confusion.

Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 13:46:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:06 UTC