W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: proposal to resolve issue-114 - Which combinations of punning should be allowed?

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:08:17 -0400
Message-Id: <2472A8C8-1FC9-4369-A369-DACC7B3D3156@gmail.com>
Cc: "'OWL 1.1'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>

On Aug 19, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Boris Motik wrote:

> Thus, it seems to me that your proposal for resolution actually  
> means we should leave the spec as it is right now (which I fully
> support).
>
> Regards,
> 	Boris

The proposal is explicitly note the allowed punning. I don't know if  
there are candidates for punning that go beyond what I've proposed  
(ontologiesURIs?) and don't want to be surprised.

-Alan
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 17:09:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 August 2008 17:09:07 GMT