W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: ISSUE-111 Proposal to Resolve

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:50:41 +0100
Message-Id: <714A2DE8-B229-4059-9EC7-F04010A6A6CB@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>

On 19 Aug 2008, at 16:40, Jim Hendler wrote:

> So we're back to the same point - we disagree and need to move  
> forward.

Ok.

>   I can live with either a specific tag or no tag at all - I have  
> problems with using this particular random piece of syntax for odd  
> reasons.  You disagree.  I think that sums things up.

In a tendentious way, I guess so ("random piece of syntax for odd  
reasons" is hardly a neutral description). But you also don't seem to  
understand that we aren't making any change to the language. So we in  
"no tag". If you don't like that bit of advice then ignore it. It  
would be, I think, an editorial issue anyway.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:48:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 August 2008 15:48:14 GMT