W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:42:23 -0400
Message-Id: <ED4AF3B6-D70F-4A48-B7DE-7DA450BB2837@gmail.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

Hello Peter,

This doesn't meet the requirements that motivated the original rich  
annotation proposal, such as allowing domain and range restrictions  
on annotations, or subProperty relationships between them.

-Alan

On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> The status is
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Aug/0060.html
>
> My view is that that is all that is required in the OWL 2  
> specification.
>
> peter
>
>
> From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:15:56 -0400
>
>> On Aug 12, 2008, at 2:09 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>
>>> From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Agenda for Teleconference.2008.08.13
>>> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:43:40 -0400
>>>
>>>> General Discussion (40 minutes)
>>>>    Annotations: Plan B.
>>>
>>> What is Plan B?
>>
>> That is the question. I would like to confer on the status of your  
>> and
>> Bijan's work on the annotation proposal, and make plans in the  
>> case that
>> it is not ready, as we discussed at the F2F. I anticipate would  
>> discuss
>> idea for annotations that fall short of the rich annotation  
>> proposal but
>> address some of the requirements our users have articulated. We had
>> postponed that pending seeing what the resolution of rich annotations
>> was.
>>
>> -Alan
>>
>>> If we are going to discuss Annotations yet again, I think that
>> pointers
>>> to the proposals up for discussion are needed, and that proposals  
>>> that
>>> have already been discussed should have evolved to be considered for
>>> re-discussion.  The only activity I see in the WG related to
>> annotations
>>> is my message from Monday
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Aug/0060.html
>>> which contains a proposal to close ISSUE-16 by adding annotations on
>>> annotations.
>>>
>>> peter
>>
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:43:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 12 August 2008 18:43:04 GMT