W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > August 2008


From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:58:49 -0400
Message-Id: <5CD13517-05EA-43E4-9374-BC1B5B607886@gmail.com>
To: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

I am confused as to it's status. The issue is whether there is a  
disallowed vocabulary. The notes have Michael saying there is, and I  
an thinks there is. This would suggest that closing the issue means  
saying that there is a disallowed vocabulary and a pointer to the  
appropriate place in the spec. However, I don't understand Peter's  
comment suggesting a break in backwards compatibility in this light.

  I will review the current spec to find what Michael is referring  
to. However a summary of current understand so as to verify we're  
(including me) are all on the same page would help if someone happens  
to have the time to write.

Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 16:59:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:06 UTC