- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:43:21 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
This is the response that Alan got from Deb: Hi, I would like to be able to say a number of things. In my inference web work, I would like to be able to say about any triple who told it to the system, and what the context was at that time (date, time, experiment conditions etc). i further want to be able to say about some statement if i (or anyone else) believes it and the truth value. I would like to be able to let people such as wiki authors and users say in a (public or private) encoding if they believe a statement or an author or a comment. So i really want to be able to encode comments about comments. It would be best if i could structure those comments in owl but if i just had a comment option for ANY triple - including comment triples - that would work. That was why very long ago when pfps provided an early proposal that allowed annotations on annotations to be first class objects, i supported it.
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 19:43:57 UTC