W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Names for top and bottom properties

From: Diego Calvanese <calvanese@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:03:20 +0200
Message-Id: <4B5E995B-71E3-4E9F-8C09-D5715865CD28@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: conrad.bock@nist.gov, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, "'Ian Horrocks'" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
To: mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de

I also like UniversalProperty.
An opposite could be EmptyProperty.

- Diego

On 30 Apr 2008, at 15:57, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 30. April 2008, Conrad Bock wrote:
>> Ian,
>>
>> UniversalProperty and NullProperty.
>>
>> Conrad
>
> "UniversalProperty" sounds nice, "NullProperty" not really, and the  
> obvious
> relatedness/symmetry is lost. Given that there is no good opposite
> of "universal", I would also vote for "TopProperty" and  
> "BottomProperty".
>
> Markus
>
> -- 
> Markus Krötzsch
> Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128 Karlsruhe
> phone +49 (0)721 608 7362          fax +49 (0)721 608 5998
> mak@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de          www  http://korrekt.org

--
Diego Calvanese
Faculty of Computer Science         e-mail: calvanese@inf.unibz.it
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano    phone: +39-0471 016 160
Piazza Domenicani 3                 fax:   +39-0471 016 009
I-39100 Bolzano-Bozen BZ, Italy     http://www.inf.unibz.it/~calvanese/
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 14:04:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 April 2008 14:04:03 GMT