W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:58:39 -0400
Cc: "Alan Wu" <alan.wu@oracle.com>, "OWL Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FB384A99-7E7D-414B-B5F4-9F39B5771286@cs.rpi.edu>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>

I apologize, but someone asked me to forward this "oldie but goodie"  
to the Working Group - perhaps it will help with your current issues:

from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0300.html

> As we move to CR, we can expect a great number of implementations to
> start. In order to help I have prepared a list of some useful
> acronyms for people to use:
> BOWL - Comes with an ontology for Bocce and petanque
> COWL - Covers the OWL language completely
> DOWL - This version of OWL has our recommendation pegged
> FOWL - Full OWL implemented poorly
> HOWL - For users who previously tried FOWL
> JOWL - no actual implementation, but lots of people jawing about its  
> features
> POWL - special implementation for the US secretary of state
> TOWL - Don't Panic if you know where you TOWL is
> VOWL - only implements five and a half features
> GROWL - For users who previously tried VOWL
> PROWL - Professional OWL, used for web crawlers
> SCOWL - semi-complete OWL, can't trust its results
> SPROWL - graphics heavy edition, co-implemented with Van Dam
> I look forward to hearing your favorites...
Received on Monday, 28 April 2008 20:59:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC