W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

RE: OWL WG agenda for Wednesday 2008-04-23

From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:43:53 +0200
Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A08BDB95@judith.fzi.de>
To: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:

>    Straw poll: Should we have a separate document for the OWL 2 Full
Semantics?

-1 on having a straw poll /now/.

If this question is about the working drafts, than I would strongly opt for
having separate working drafts for different topics, which are in different
development stages, and which are edited by different people. This makes our
editing job much easier, and it won't delay a last call for the one
document, when the content of the other document is still under
construction. 

If this question is about the final rec documents, than I believe that we
can happily defer this question. Merging two finished document into one
won't take us three man months of work.

Cheers,
Michael



Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 19:44:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 April 2008 19:44:40 GMT