W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Raised but not yet accepted issues

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:02:41 +0100
Message-ID: <480CBAA1.2080102@hpl.hp.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>, ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk

+1

I feel me and michael have been more discussing whether or not the full 
related issues are sensible issues rather than the best resolutions.

Jeremy


Michael Schneider wrote:
> Hi Alan!
> 
> I think we should talk about this principle in general. In the past, since
> this "raise quietly" rule has been introduced, it happened several times
> that issues got almost /not/ opened, simply because there were many people
> who did not have any idea what these issues are about, while there were one
> or two other people who opposed to them.
> 
> I would rather prefer to have a discussion /before/ the first telco. An
> issue should get into the "open" state, if it is not non-sensical. If most
> people do not have any clue about an issue, then such an issue may easily
> happen to be regarded as non-sensical by most.
> 
> Just my opinion.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org]
>> On Behalf Of Alan Ruttenberg
>> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 4:55 PM
>> To: OWL Working Group WG
>> Subject: Raised but not yet accepted issues
>>
>>
>> Issues 110 through 122 are current in status RAISED. Ian and I are
>> discussing which of these issues to accept at the moment, so we would
>> appreciate if there not be discussion of them on the WG email list
>> until we have decided.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Alan
>>
> 
Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 16:04:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 April 2008 16:04:46 GMT