W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: ISSUE-120 (broken OWL 1 Full semantics): Fixing the inconsistency of OWL 1 Full will break perfect backwards compatibility

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:16:49 +0100
Message-ID: <480CA1D1.9010009@hpl.hp.com>
To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Michael Schneider wrote:
> Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>> We have a lightweight process for editorial issues, and I am tentatively
>> advocating that this should be used for this issue.
>> Jeremy
> Ah, but I believe that this isn't applicable in this case, since there doesn't 
> exist an OWL 2 Full document at the moment.
> Cheers,
> Michael

We have already agreed that it is a delta on the S&AS section 5, so it 
seems analagous to the problems related to editorial issues in the 
member submission docs.

Received on Monday, 21 April 2008 14:17:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC