W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-106: namespace for owl2 rdf/xml

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:46:06 +0100
Message-ID: <4808980E.7060803@hpl.hp.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
CC: public-owl-wg@w3.org

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> OK, then let's at least try to move forward on ISSUE-106:
> 
> PROPOSED:  Resolve ISSUE-106 by making the owl2 namespace the same as
> 	   the owl namespace. 
> 
> peter


Given that this would be a decision that the OWL namespace is mutable, 
we should document in what ways it is mutable, as specified by the TAG:

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/namespaceState.html


i.e.

>> 2) we should state a policy for management of owl namespace in our
>> documents; and as an errata in the old document too. 
>>


Jeremy
Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 12:47:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 April 2008 12:47:03 GMT