Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > OK, then let's at least try to move forward on ISSUE-106: > > PROPOSED: Resolve ISSUE-106 by making the owl2 namespace the same as > the owl namespace. > > peter Given that this would be a decision that the OWL namespace is mutable, we should document in what ways it is mutable, as specified by the TAG: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/namespaceState.html i.e. >> 2) we should state a policy for management of owl namespace in our >> documents; and as an errata in the old document too. >> JeremyReceived on Friday, 18 April 2008 12:47:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 April 2008 12:47:03 GMT