W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:03:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20080417.120356.95787686.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-57: errata on OWL 1.0 documents
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:47:03 +0100

> 
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> > I propose to close ISSUE-57 as none of the problematic pieces of
> > the OWL 1.0 documents survive in the OWL 2 documents.
> > peter
> > 
> 
> No.
> 
> While peter is correct in the observation, the issue also lists a number
> of comments which might merit errata against the OWL 1 docs, and I think
> this group should at some point consider them, and make errata on the
> OWL 1 docs as required.
> 
> i.e. we have some obligation for on-going maintenance of the OWL1 specs,
> even though our primary task is OWL2.

Is approving errata for the OWL 1 documents in our scope of operations
at all?  I was assuming that it was not.

> Jeremy

peter
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2008 16:07:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 April 2008 16:07:31 GMT